6. Bakom Muren

Open Standard Production Classic Production Optics Combined 6. Bakom Muren
STAGE
%
STAGE
PTS
HIT
FACTOR
PTS TIME First name Last name DIV CAT Club
1 100.00 120.0000 7.2626 104 14.32 Peter Eliasson Standard- - UPSF
2 96.41 115.6931 7.0019 110 15.71 Erik Isacsson Open+ S Kullen PK
3 95.31 114.3674 6.9217 114 16.47 Daniel Lilienberg Production Optics- - GDS
4 94.78 113.7344 6.8834 108 15.69 Mikael Östling Production- - GDS
5 94.19 113.0310 6.8408 110 16.08 Erik Larsson Classic- - GDS
6 92.71 111.2502 6.7330 115 17.08 Eric Särèn Open+ - GDS
7 88.54 106.2519 6.4305 118 18.35 Robert Antonsson Production- - GDS
8 82.04 98.4512 5.9584 106 17.79 Jens H Production Optics- - GDS
9 75.95 91.1415 5.5160 93 16.86 Robert Hult Production- - GDS
10 75.35 90.4160 5.4721 102 18.64 Kristoffer Mann Standard- - GDS
11 74.32 89.1871 5.3977 114 21.12 Amir Mohammadi Production- - GDS
12 73.90 88.6781 5.3669 98 18.26 Joachim Nilsson Standard- - GPIF
13 73.30 87.9555 5.3232 112 21.04 Henrik Bergsten Production- - GDS
14 72.99 87.5865 5.3009 111 20.94 Gustav Steneholm Standard+ - GDS
15 66.74 80.0863 4.8469 114 23.52 Tom Ekenstråle Production Optics- J GDS
16 63.89 76.6671 4.6400 116 25.00 Tobias Ekenstråle Production Optics- - GDS
17 58.08 69.6954 4.2181 106 25.13 Martin Bengtsson Production- - Växjö Pk
18 57.73 69.2766 4.1927 114 27.19 Max Ekenstråle Production- J GDS
19 56.60 67.9209 4.1107 104 25.30 Andreas Johanson Production Optics- - GDS
20 55.73 66.8704 4.0471 110 27.18 Joakim Flövik Production- - GDS
21 55.26 66.3088 4.0131 98 24.42 Sat Sangeet "Singh" Hansen Production- S GDS
22 52.70 63.2420 3.8275 71 18.55 Daniel Jonsson Production- - GDS
23 48.89 58.6678 3.5507 116 32.67 Villgot Englund Standard- - GDS
24 47.78 57.3356 3.4700 110 31.70 Marcus Lindström Production Optics- - GDS
25 46.46 55.7480 3.3739 108 32.01 Hans Linhardt Production- S GDS
None disqualified for this division/category
Download *.pdf:
match results combined results division stage results category stage results combined stage results
View all DQ'ed competitors